For municipalities
Your municipality is already mapped
Sensory accessibility is the one dimension of public space that almost no municipality measures, which means it does not appear in inclusion agendas, accessibility reporting, or spatial policy. Not because it does not matter, but because there has been nothing to report.
Coverage runs from the four largest cities down to towns of around fifteen thousand people. There is a strong chance yours is already included. See the full list.
The gap this fills
Physical accessibility of public space is well documented. Kerb heights, step-free routes, accessible toilets, and door widths are surveyed, regulated, and reported on.
Sensory accessibility is not surveyed at all, despite affecting a large share of residents. The two barriers behave differently, which is why one gets measured and the other does not. A step turns someone away visibly, and that exclusion can be counted. Noise, lighting, and crowding produce something quieter: residents decide not to come. Nobody is refused entry, no complaint is filed, and the exclusion never enters any dataset.
The result is a policy blind spot that looks like an absence of demand. Residents who cannot use the station concourse, the market square, or the library at busy times are not represented anywhere in the evidence base, so nothing is designed for them.
What we can provide
A baseline sensory picture of your public space
Noise, light, and crowd intensity mapped across your municipality, at a level of detail suitable for policy work rather than anecdote. This part exists today.
Resident-contributed data
Ratings from residents with sensory sensitivities, describing how specific locations actually feel to them. This layer is still thin outside our most active cities. It grows with participation, and a municipality can meaningfully accelerate it in its own area. Treat it as something a pilot would build together rather than a finished dataset.
Reporting
Sensory accessibility framed so it can be cited in an inclusion agenda, an accessibility statement, or a spatial planning process. Structured reporting output is not something we offer off the shelf yet; it is part of what a first pilot would define.
Obligations this connects to
Dutch municipalities have duties on accessibility and inclusion arising from the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, which the Netherlands ratified in 2016, and most maintain a local inclusion agenda as a result. Separately, the European Accessibility Act has applied since June 2025.
Sensory accessibility sits inside the scope of inclusion work but outside the scope of what is currently measured, which is precisely why it tends to be omitted from these documents. It connects to this work; we would not claim it compels any specific action.
Start with your own municipality
We will put together a sensory accessibility overview of your municipality, showing what the data currently indicates about your public space and where the gaps in coverage are. No cost, and no procurement process needed to receive it.
It is a more useful basis for a conversation than a proposal written before either of us has looked at your city.
Request an overviewWhere we are
Jome is early and independently funded. We are looking for a small number of municipalities to run a first pilot with, rather than a long client list.
For a municipality that wants to be first on something, that is the opportunity. For one that wants a proven supplier with reference customers, we are not there yet, and we would rather say so now.
Talk to us
Email welcome@jome.app. Tell us which municipality you work for and what you are working on, and we will come back to you.
Jome is a product of Sa'i, registered in the Netherlands, KVK 92728626.
If you run a single venue rather than working for a municipality, see For venues.